Home Noticias de Salud Family Centers Health Centers Resources My Health Manager
  Search
  PersonalMD Services  
  Family Health
  Women's Health
  Children's Health
  Men's Health
  Senior's Health
   
  Health Centers
  Alternative Medicine
  Cardiac Care Center
  Cancer Center
  Emergency Dept
  Medical Advances
  Nutrition Central
  Pulmonary Center
  Sports Medicine
  Travel Medicine
   
  Resources
  Drug Interaction
  Drugs & Medications
  Health Encyclopedia


     
   
Mammograms after age 69 offer little benefit

By Will Boggs, MD

NEW YORK, (Reuters Health) -- Mammography screening for breast cancer offers only minimal gains in life expectancy for women beyond the age of 69, a factor that should be taken into consideration when elderly women are deciding about breast cancer screening, US researchers suggest.

"Mammography offers the greatest potential benefit for women between 50 and 69 years old. Beyond that, the benefits are pretty small," said Dr. Karla Kerlikowske from the University of California, San Francisco, in an interview with Reuters Health.

Kerlikowske and colleagues compared three different breast cancer screening strategies for women over age 65: mammography every 2 years between ages 65 and 69; mammography every 2 years from age 65 to 69, followed by continued mammography only for women who have higher levels of bone density; and mammography every 2 years between ages 65 and 79. Their results are published in the December 8th issue of The Journal of the American Medical Association.

The second strategy, basing mammography decisions on the results of bone density testing, would add an average of only 2 days of life per woman screened, compared to mammography only through age 69, the authors report. In other words, more than 1,000 women would have to be enrolled in this strategy to save one death from breast cancer, at an additional cost of nearly $67,000 per year of life saved.

Continuing biennial mammography through age 79 would save only an additional three-tenths of a day per woman, compared to the second strategy, the report indicates, requiring nearly 10,000 mammograms to prevent one breast cancer death. The additional cost to save one year of life would exceed $117,000.

"Based on these results, one could justify using mammography to screen healthy, elderly women with the highest bone mineral density levels as a general policy," said Kerlikowske. "Even then, though, simply using a clinical breast exam may be more appropriate."

All things considered, the authors suggest that elderly women might reasonably decide to forego mammography screening for breast cancer. "Women's preferences for a small gain in life expectancy and the potential harms of screening should play an important role when elderly women are deciding about screening," they conclude.


DISCUSSION
See what PersonalMD members have to say about this article.
 

 
 

 

Register About Us Emergency Contact us Privacy Policy Help Center
Resources Health Centers Family Health