Home Noticias de Salud Family Centers Health Centers Resources My Health Manager
  Search
  PersonalMD Services  
  Family Health
  Women's Health
  Children's Health
  Men's Health
  Senior's Health
   
  Health Centers
  Alternative Medicine
  Cardiac Care Center
  Cancer Center
  Emergency Dept
  Medical Advances
  Nutrition Central
  Pulmonary Center
  Sports Medicine
  Travel Medicine
   
  Resources
  Drug Interaction
  Drugs & Medications
  Health Encyclopedia


     
   
NIH center backs research into alternative therapies

By Alicia Ault

CRYSTAL CITY, Va., Jun 13 (Reuters Health) - Dr. Stephen Straus, the director of the National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine, said Saturday that practitioners have to start proving scientifically that alternative therapies work. Straus also noted that his agency has been given $70 million this fiscal year to help fund such studies. "Our job, in fact, is to make a science out of complementary and alternative medicine," said Straus, speaking to the estimated 1,200 attendees of the Comprehensive Cancer Care 2000 meeting.

He described an ambitious agenda for the National Center, a division of the National Institutes of Health (NIH). A wide-ranging program is needed to begin addressing which complementary and alternative (CAM) practices work, and which don't, Straus said, noting that more Americans are using CAM. And, he said, "there is good reason to believe that some of these practices are effective." He also said more insurers were paying for practices such as chiropractic, acupuncture and massage, but for the wrong reasons. Their decisions have been based on public pressure and state mandates--not science, Straus said. The National Center is funding centers of excellence around the country, which will conduct early safety and efficacy studies, determine how therapies work, and teach CAM practitioners how to do more rigorous scientific research.

Centers funded so far include ones that will focus on cancer, asthma, arthritis, pediatrics, addiction, chiropractic, aging, and cranio-facial health. Centers on botanicals are also being funded, said Straus. These centers are crucial because they will research how herbal products work, what are the active and inactive ingredients, and find ways to standardize preparations so they can reliably be used in clinical trials. Nonstandard herbal formulas are a concern, said Straus, noting that many off-the-shelf remedies contain the wrong parts of plants or may be adulterated, or have no expiration date.

He said most Americans don't seem to care. "Americans buy botanicals like they buy wine--if the label looks pretty and it's expensive, they buy it," Straus commented.

The National Center's most ambitious effort currently is funding five large clinical trials: St. John's wort to treat depression, which is completing enrollment this week; acupuncture for osteoarthritis pain; glucosamine/chondroitin sulfate for arthritis; shark cartilage for non-small cell lung cancer; and the largest study ever of dementia, a 3,000-patient trial of ginkgo biloba in people aged 75 and over.

That study will cost $16 million and run four years, Straus said. The agency also hopes to increase funding of studies at its NIH campus and grants to individual investigators with promising early studies, he said. In cancer, the National Center will be getting input on promising new research to fund from its 15-member Cancer Advisory Panel on Complementary and Alternative Medicine.


DISCUSSION
See what PersonalMD members have to say about this article.
 

 

 

 

Register About Us Emergency Contact us Privacy Policy Help Center
Resources Health Centers Family Health