Home Noticias de Salud Family Centers Health Centers Resources My Health Manager
  Search
  PersonalMD Services  
  Family Health
  Women's Health
  Children's Health
  Men's Health
  Senior's Health
   
  Health Centers
  Alternative Medicine
  Cardiac Care Center
  Cancer Center
  Emergency Dept
  Medical Advances
  Nutrition Central
  Pulmonary Center
  Sports Medicine
  Travel Medicine
   
  Resources
  Drug Interaction
  Drugs & Medications
  Health Encyclopedia


     
   
Junk food tax could fund health campaigns

NEW YORK, Jun 02 (Reuters Health) - Putting a small tax on soft drinks, candy, and other snack foods nationwide could raise over $1 billion a year for health promotion campaigns, without significantly affecting the price or sales of these items, US researchers suggest.

"With obesity rates soaring and the costs of diet-related diseases in the stratosphere, it is essential that government fund major campaigns to promote healthful diets and physical activity," stated Dr. Michael F. Jacobson from the Center for Science in the Public Interest in Washington, DC. "One way to obtain funding is to apply small taxes to foods that undermine health."

Jacobson and colleague Dr. Kelly D. Brownell of Yale University in New Haven, Connecticut, reviewed programs in 19 states and cities--including California, New York, and the city of Chicago--that currently levy such taxes on soft drinks, chewing gum, candy, and/or snack foods such as potato chips and pretzels. They discovered that small taxes on these items are generating millions of dollars each year, but the state and city governments are not putting the money into public health campaigns.

"We estimate that a national tax of 1 cent per 12-ounce soft drink would generate about $1.5 billion annually. Similarly, taxes of 1 cent per pound of candy, chips and other snack foods, or fats and oils, would raise about $70 million, $54 million, and $190 million, respectively," the authors write. Jacobson and Brownell point out that because such small taxes would not significantly affect the price of these goods, consumers would not oppose them. A recent poll showed that 45% of adults surveyed were in favor of this kind of 1-cent tax.

"Health officials often wish to sponsor nutrition and other health promotion programs but are hampered by lack of funding," the team notes in the June issue of the American Journal of Public Health, journal of the American Public Health Association.

The researchers point out that even large organizations like the National Cancer Institute (NCI) have only small budgets for health promotion. The NCI's 5-A-Day campaign, which encourages people to eat more fruits and vegetables, costs about $1 million a year. The soft drink industry alone spends 600 times that amount on advertising each year, the report indicates.

"The soft drink and snack food industries oppose and have campaigned against special taxes on their products," Jacobson and Brownell explain. The authors suggest that small taxes are "more politically feasible and still could generate significant revenues to support health measures."

Jacobson and Brownell cite government statistics estimating that up to half a million people die each year from cancer, cardiovascular disease, and diabetes caused in part by poor diet and lack of physical activity. These diet-related illnesses cost the nation over $71 billion annually.

"We suggest that public health professionals consider recommending snack taxes as a means of funding healthy eating and physical activity programs," Jacobson and Brownell conclude. "Such programs could result in better health and lower healthcare costs."


DISCUSSION
See what PersonalMD members have to say about this article.
 

 

 

 

Register About Us Emergency Contact us Privacy Policy Help Center
Resources Health Centers Family Health