By
Amy Norton, Medical Tribune News Service
A
type of heart-valve defect that has been linked to serious complications
is less common and less severe than the medical world has thought,
according to two reports.
Only
a small portion of the general population suffers from mitral-valve
prolapse, and the condition is more benign than previous research
has suggested, researchers reported in Thursday's issue of The
New England Journal of Medicine.
Looking
at more than 1,600 men and women involved in a government heart-health
study, researchers found that just 2.4 percent had mitral-valve
prolapse -- far fewer than estimates from past studies that suggested
5 percent to 35 percent of Americans have the condition. The study
was led by Dr. Emelia J. Benjamin, an associate professor of medicine
at Boston University School of Medicine.
In
a second study, Boston researchers found that mitral-valve prolapse
was no more common among 213 young stroke victims than among 263
subjects with healthy hearts -- contradicting previous studies
that have linked the two conditions in patients age 45 and younger.
Dr. Robert A. Levine, an associate professor of medicine at Harvard
Medical School, led the study.
Mitral-valve
prolapse occurs when the valve that regulates blood flow from
the heart's left atrium to the left ventricle sinks from its normal
position. Normally, the mitral valve shuts when the heart contracts;
a prolapsed valve may fail to close properly, allowing some blood
to flow back through the valve, sometimes causing a murmer. A
condition called mitral regurgitation may develop, and this sometimes
requires repair or replacement of the valve.
But
in the Boston University study, few patients with mitral-valve
prolapse experienced severe mitral regurgitation, the most common
complication of prolapse. Just 7 percent of patients with ``classic''
prolapse suffered regurgitation, and none with the ``non-classic''
form did. In contrast to some past studies, the rates of heart
failure and other heart disease were no higher among prolapse
patients than controls.
Previous
reports of a much higher prevalence of prolapse largely came from
hospital-based studies -- an imperfect way to measure its frequency
in the general public. In the 1970s and 1980s, Benjamin noted,
mitral-valve prolapse appeared to be epidemic, often being diagnosed
in otherwise healthy young people -- particularly women -- who
had unexplained chest pain or heart palpitations.
But
after mitral-valve prolapse was first recognized in the late 1960s,
the ensuing prolapse ``fad,'' Benjamin explained, was largely
due to physicians' ``enthusiasm for making the diagnosis.'' She
noted that in her team's study the condition was no more common
among women than men.
In
the 1980s, the condition was linked to stroke in younger patients
when some studies showed a high prevalence of prolapse among stroke
victims 45 and younger. One study of young stroke patients revealed
that 40 percent had mitral-valve prolapse.
In
both current reports, however, the researchers noted that improved,
two-dimensional imaging of the heart allowed them to more accurately
discern mitral-valve prolapse, compared with these past studies.
Doctors
have in recent years gained a better understanding of the mitral
valve itself, Benjamin noted.
``We
now know that the valve is saddle-shaped,'' she said, adding that
this knowledge has perfected the way in which echocardiographers
interpret heart images.
``The
brain attached to the machine knows more,'' said Levine, who led
the stroke study.
Using
diagnostic criteria updated from the early studies of stroke and
mitral-valve prolapse, Levine's team found ``no evidence of an
association.''
In
fact, prolapse was slightly more common among subjects who did
not suffer a stroke -- 2.7 percent had the condition, compared
with 1.9 percent among stroke patients. Instead, Levine said,
most of the stroke patients had other risk factors -- such as
high blood pressure, artery disease or diabetes -- that explained
the early-age strokes.
``Even
in patients with unexplained stroke,'' Levine added, ``prolapse
wasn't more frequent [compared with controls].
''
People who have been diagnosed with mitral-valve prolapse, said
Benjamin, should consider when the diagnosis was made. Those diagnosed
before the late 1980s might not really have the condition, she
noted.
``Complications
are very real,'' Benjamin said, ``but the majority of patients
don't have complications.''

