Home Noticias de Salud Family Centers Health Centers Resources My Health Manager
  Search
  PersonalMD Services  
  Family Health
  Women's Health
  Children's Health
  Men's Health
  Senior's Health
   
  Health Centers
  Alternative Medicine
  Cardiac Care Center
  Cancer Center
  Emergency Dept
  Medical Advances
  Nutrition Central
  Pulmonary Center
  Sports Medicine
  Travel Medicine
   
  Resources
  Drug Interaction
  Drugs & Medications
  Health Encyclopedia


Back to: Children's Health > Updates    
     
Health Update
 

 

FDA Now Requires That New Drugs For Children Be Tested In Children

By Carolyn Poirot, Fort Worth Star-Telegram

Abby Goldberg, 8, takes nine medications every day to combat severe asthma -- and she still has a hard time breathing. Seven of her drugs are not approved for use in children under 12. One tablet, her mother must break in half. Another pill, the mother cuts in two with a gadget from the pharmacist.

``She is bigger now. When she needed quarters, that was really hard,'' says Wendy Goldberg, Abby's mother. The pill is coated and hard, like a little stone. It doesn't always divide evenly.

``Do I give her the big half or the small half? I usually give her the bigger piece in the morning on the theory that if something really bad happens, at least we will always be awake,'' the mother testified at a joint hearing sponsored by the Food and Drug Administration and the American Academy of Pediatrics.

About 70 percent of the drugs used in children have never been tested in children, according to the Pediatric Pharmacy Advocacy Group. Even most of the drugs used in the smallest, premature infants usually are not approved for children.

But that changed April 1, when the FDA began requiring that new drugs with potential to benefit children be tested in children and labeled assafe and effective for use in children.

``We've been experimenting on children for 20 years now,'' says Dr. Dianne Murphy, director of pediatrics for the FDA. ``Most drugs used in children have never been adequately tested in children.

``It's important because we know children are not just small adults. They are changing. Their systems are changing, their brains are changing, their guts are changing, their bones are all changing, and we need to know if we are giving them the right dose -- enough to be therapeutic but not more than necessary,'' Murphy says.

Despite a lack of scientific evidence to support their safety and effectiveness in youngsters, drugs that work well in adults are commonly used in children because doctors believe they offer the best available treatment. (Once a drug is approved by the FDA, doctors are able to prescribe it for any age patient, as best they see fit.) In lieu of testing, pediatricians often base their decisions on reports published in professional journals and on word-of-mouth.

Prozac, for instance, was prescribed 349,000 times to pediatric patients in a single year -- even though the popular anti-depressant carries a disclaimer warning that ``safety and effectiveness for those under 12 years of age are not established.''

``Children sometimes react differently,'' Murphy points out. ``Sometimes they tolerate drugs better than adults so there are less adverse effects, but they may have different adverse effects.''

A whole generation of children had their teeth damaged and discolored in the late 1960s and early 1970s because of the popular antibiotic tetracycline.

Adult males who tested the drug had no such side effects, and it was never tested in children or in women. As a result, it was years before researchers made the connection between the drug and the discolored teeth.

It was even longer before anyone realized that tetracycline antibiotics cross the placenta in pregnant women and are stored in the fetus's bones and teeth, where they combine with calcium. As a result, bone growth may be slow, the baby's teeth may be permanently yellow, and the tooth enamel may be soft and abnormally susceptible to cavities.

In the 1950s, chloramphenicol, an antibiotic that killed penicillin-resistant infections, was widely used in adults. Newborn babies with infections were also given chloramphenicol, but without the benefit of studies on pediatric dosing. Twenty-three babies died before it was learned that the immature livers of these infants were unable to clear the drug from their bodies, allowing toxic doses to build up.

In contrast, pediatric AIDS specialists say many babies born with HIV may have died because they were not given drugs developed to treat HIV in adults. Ten years ago, doctors were hesitant to prescribe the powerful new drugs for babies or pregnant women.

The nonprofit Pediatric Pharmacy Advocacy Group was set up to improve the safe use of medications in children through educational programs for pediatric pharmacists; monitoring FDA testimony on drugs and adverse drug reactions; and collecting data that deal with the safe use of drugs in children.

``We are trying to get pediatric dosage forms established,'' says Hank Wedemeyer, the group's executive director. ``Most drugs today have to be manipulated by pharmacists for use in children. They may need to smash a 500 milligram tablet, break it up to get the right amount for a child or dissolve it so a child can take it.


Register About Us Emergency Contact us Privacy Policy Help Center
Resources Health Centers Family Health